This is the first year I live in uk,and also the first time to learn the courses about architecture. Seems I didn't bring my A-game here this year. I know there was something wrong with me.Such as my language , writing skill,my drawing skills,my design ideas..... A lot of things I'm really not good at.:(
After all my classmates pinned their work on the wall, I found most of them have their own good qualities on this subject.Some are really talented. And I'm really confused if I'm really suitable for this subject.If it is correct for me to choose architecture as my major.?Somebody told me before that maybe I was good at interior design instead of architecture design. Seems it is right. But who knows?
Next year ,maybe I will make more english friends ,and know more the cultures about Scotland.If I have time to do that.
Hope everthing will be ok! Hope I will never regret to choose architecture as my major and my career.~ :)
Monday, 2 May 2011
Sunday, 1 May 2011
Tecnoics Works
Tectonics work
This is my favorite one.Seems it has some unreasonable parts. :( Does the arches can't be supported by columns ?I think colunmns can really do that , but it just will make something strange on vision.
I developed them into my Pavillion Project. But I think this smaller one is much more special ..I drew a 3d-sketch by marker . But seems it is not common to see marker drawing here. Most of drawing my classmates made are pencial drawings. So I'm really confused that if I really need to draw such drawing...=_=
The structure inside,I think should be like an arch bridge, I also drew some sketches about the structure,actually I think they can work. But once again ,it was negative by tutor....Heart-broken. %>_<%
Finally ,I change them into another kind of structure,but I really don't like .
This is an another choice I made. But unfortunally , it is so weak . The structure in it is really unsteady. Maybe I need to add some cross beams to make them much more stronger .
Cutter Report - How to Measure Success: Use EA to Define Architecture
I have just read the Cutter Report by Michael Rosen on the success or otherwise of enterprise architecture.
Here are some points that struck me as interesting:
"77% report that they have architectural models representing their current state. Somewhat fewer, 56% report that they have models representing their future state. This could indicate that many organizations have more of a focus on managing complexity, which requires a good understanding of the current state and less focus on alignment/strategy."
"organizations with a disdain for agile (no integration) report the highest percentage of overall EA effectiveness"
"37% of EA organizations have no way to measure EA success"
"6%, have a mature and well-established program"
There are many more interesting insights into the current state of EA but I think I would get in trouble if I relayed more of them...
Here are some points that struck me as interesting:
"77% report that they have architectural models representing their current state. Somewhat fewer, 56% report that they have models representing their future state. This could indicate that many organizations have more of a focus on managing complexity, which requires a good understanding of the current state and less focus on alignment/strategy."
"organizations with a disdain for agile (no integration) report the highest percentage of overall EA effectiveness"
"37% of EA organizations have no way to measure EA success"
"6%, have a mature and well-established program"
There are many more interesting insights into the current state of EA but I think I would get in trouble if I relayed more of them...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)